1. Current Location: Home >  NAS >  4. Is the N100 small host with the network port the underlying virtual Feiniu OS through PVE, or do you choose Feiniu OS as the underlying virtual Aikui?

4. Is the N100 small host with the network port the underlying virtual Feiniu OS through PVE, or do you choose Feiniu OS as the underlying virtual Aikui?

want to be "stable", choose PVE as the bottom, and then virtualize Feiniu OS and ifast respectively; If you want "simple + All-in-One", choose Feiniu OS as the base, and then virtually love fast in its KVM, but you have to accept the risk that the main system will be disconnected once the whole family is disconnected. The following is a key comparison to make it easier to weigh according to your own needs.

image.png


respectively
dimensions PVE → Virtual Flying Bull + Aikuai Feiniu OS → KVM Virtual Love
stability high. PVE focuses on virtualization, and there are many cases where it runs on 2×4 of July and does not restart for more than 2 years. Hanging up either aircraft does not affect the other passenger aircraft or the host network. middle. The Feiniu OS itself is still iterating rapidly, and the underlying KVM functions are available but the verification time is short; Once the main system of Feiniu is restarted or down, it will fall together and the whole family will be disconnected.
performance loss very small. The N100 supports VT-d / SR-IOV, the network port can be directly connected or bridged, and the CPU iperf3 can run up to 2.5 G. The core display can also be assigned SR-IOV to Feiniu hard solution, and only 2 cores and 1 GB are enough for iKuai. slightly higher. After the Flying Bull host eats up 1~1.5 GB of memory + part of the CPU, and then allocates 2 cores and 1 GB to iKuai, the remaining resources are enough for lightweight NAS applications, but the CPU usage will reach 60-70% when using high concurrency transcoding + large bandwidth QoS.
Ease of use slightly more complicated. You have to install PVE first, connect to pass/bridge, and install two virtual machines, which has a learning cost for beginners. simple. In the graphical "application center", you can pull up the virtual machine with a few clicks; The Flying Bull comes with an OVS switch, which eliminates the need for command line bridging.
feature extension extremely strong. In addition to Flying Bull and Aikuai, you can also open OpenWrt, Windows, and Ubuntu on PVE; Snapshots, backups, clones, and clusters are fully functional. limited. The built-in KVM currently does not have advanced features such as cloning and scheduled backup.
the order of network startup dependent. PVE starts first, and then it doesn't matter who loves fast and flying bull first; PVE is still online when iAi crashes, and you can SSH to troubleshoot obstacles. dependent. You must wait for the flying bull host to start before you can pull up the love and fast; Therefore, during the first cold start, the downstream device will not be able to obtain DHCP for a short time, and it is necessary to set the iKuai to "automatic start" and add a delay of 30-60 seconds.
Note: The performance loss here refers to the performance loss of PVE as the bottom layer and Feiniu OS as the bottom layer, but the actual situation is the opposite. PVE + Feiniu OS + Love Kuai vs. Feiniu OS + Love Kuai, there is an additional system performance loss that is higher.
Quick Selection Suggestions:
  1. If you use the N100 as the "main entrance to the home network", the NAS is just a side hustle, or you need to be uninterrupted 24×7, please go directly to PVE. After PVE:
    • four network ports are made into a Linux Bridge (vmbr0-3), the first port is directly connected to iKuai as a WAN, and the remaining three ports are used as a LAN;
    • love fast gives 2 cores 1 GB hard drive 2 GB enough;
    • Feiniu gives 4 cores and 4 GB (depending on the transcoding requirements), and the disk uses all the left;
    • core display is open SR-IOV to 1 VF for Feiniu, which can be hardware transcoded to 4K H.265.
  2. if you want to use only one web interface to manage NAS and soft routing at the same time, it doesn't matter if the network is disconnected for 2-3 minutes, or if you just like to toss and turn the experience, then using Feiniu OS is no problem at all. Installation method: In order not to waste the 4-network port N100 small host Feiniu NAS, install Aikai to save a router
therefore: "stability, expansion, and long-term use" choose PVE virtual love fast and flying bull respectively; "Simple and acceptable disconnection" → Feiniudi virtual love fast. Choose one of the two according to your tolerance for network reliability.
Read More


Copyright Notice Scan to read on mobile
All Rights Reserved: 《SHUNOT》 => 《4. Is the N100 small host with the network port the underlying virtual Feiniu OS through PVE, or do you choose Feiniu OS as the underlying virtual Aikui?
Article URL: https://www.shunot.com/en/nas/683.html
Unless otherwise stated, all articles are original by 《Routing enthusiast》. Reposting is welcome! Please indicate the original URL when reposting, thank you.

Comment List

Son of the wind
Son of the windReply
#29
It is simpler to choose Feiniu OS, but the stability is poor, and the main system crashes and loses; It is more reliable to use PVE as the bottom, and the risk of separate virtualization is low, making it suitable for users with high stability requirements.
4 个月前
An old dream of t...
An old dream of t...Reply
#28
Choose Feiniu OS is easy to use but high risk, PVE is more stable but complex to configure. Trade-off according to demand, if stability is pursued, PVE is more reliable; If you pay attention to simplicity, Feiniu OS is more convenient.
4 个月前
The road is long
The road is longReply
#27
It is simpler to choose Feiniu OS as the bottom, but the stability risk is high; Although PVE is complex, it can run Feiniu and Aikui independently without interfering with each other, making it more suitable for users who pursue system stability.
4 个月前
It's better to go...
It's better to go...Reply
#26
It is easier to choose Feiniu OS, but the stability is poor, and the main system has problems and loses everything; Using PVE is more stable, but the configuration is complicated. According to the trade-off of demand, if you are looking for stability, PVE is a better choice.
5 个月前
Please give me mo...
Please give me mo...Reply
#25
It is simpler to choose Feiniu OS as the bottom, but the risk is high; PVE is more stable and suitable for users who pursue reliability. Weigh them according to your needs, each with its own advantages and disadvantages.
5 个月前
The white hair is...
The white hair is...Reply
#24
It is simpler to choose Feiniu OS as the bottom, suitable for users with less tossing, but the stability is poor, and the main system crash will lead to network disconnection, which is a higher risk. PVE virtualization is more reliable if stability is pursued, but the setup is relatively complex.
5 个月前
The mountains and...
The mountains and...Reply
#23
Choosing Feiniu OS is more trouble-free, but the risk is high; PVE is complex, but more stable. According to the trade-off of needs, if you pursue stability, PVE is a safe choice, and if it is convenient, Feiniu OS is also sufficient.
5 个月前
Drinking alone on...
Drinking alone on...Reply
#22
It is simpler to choose Feiniu OS as the bottom, but the risk is high; PVE is more stable and suitable for users with high reliability requirements. Weigh them according to your needs, each with its own advantages and disadvantages.
5 个月前
The west wind blo...
The west wind blo...Reply
#21
It is safer to choose the bottom layer of PVE, although it is a little complicated, but it can run Feiniu and Aikai independently, avoiding the main system failure and causing network disconnection. If you pursue simplicity, although Feiniu OS is convenient, it is risky, and you need to weigh the usage scenarios.
5 个月前
Passing tourists
Passing touristsReply
#20
Choose Feiniu OS is better, simple and easy to use, suitable for users who don't want to toss, but the stability is slightly worse; If stability is pursued, PVE is more reliable, although slightly complex, it can take into account the operation of multiple systems.
5 个月前
Ink fragrance
Ink fragranceReply
#19
It is easier to choose Feiniu OS, but the stability is poor, and the main system crashes and causes the network to be disconnected. Using PVE is more stable, but the configuration is complicated. According to the trade-off of demand, if you are looking for stability, PVE is a better choice.
5 个月前
One page book
One page bookReply
#18
It is simpler to choose Feiniu OS as the bottom, but the stability is poor, and once there is a problem with the main system, Aikai will also be paralyzed, affecting the overall network use. It is suitable for users who seek convenience rather than absolute stability.
5 个月前
A time of allure
A time of allureReply
#17
It is simpler to choose Feiniu OS, but the stability is slightly worse; Using PVE as a base is more stable, but a little troublesome. Depending on the trade-off of demand, PVE is a more reliable choice if stability is pursued.
5 个月前
Free flight
Free flightReply
#16
It is simpler to choose Feiniu OS as the bottom, but the stability is slightly inferior; If stability is pursued, PVE is more reliable. Weigh them according to your needs, each with its own advantages and disadvantages.
5 个月前
The remnants of d...
The remnants of d...Reply
#15
PVE is more stable as a base system and is suitable for users who pay attention to reliability; Although Feiniu OS is simple, it is risky, and it is necessary to weigh whether to accept the possibility of network disconnection caused by the collapse of the main system.
5 个月前

Contact Us

Online Consultation: Click here to send me a message

WeChat ID: master_135

Scan to follow