1. Current Location: Home >  NAS >  4. Is the N100 small host with the network port the underlying virtual Feiniu OS through PVE, or do you choose Feiniu OS as the underlying virtual Aikui?

4. Is the N100 small host with the network port the underlying virtual Feiniu OS through PVE, or do you choose Feiniu OS as the underlying virtual Aikui?

want to be "stable", choose PVE as the bottom, and then virtualize Feiniu OS and ifast respectively; If you want "simple + All-in-One", choose Feiniu OS as the base, and then virtually love fast in its KVM, but you have to accept the risk that the main system will be disconnected once the whole family is disconnected. The following is a key comparison to make it easier to weigh according to your own needs.

image.png


respectively
dimensions PVE → Virtual Flying Bull + Aikuai Feiniu OS → KVM Virtual Love
stability high. PVE focuses on virtualization, and there are many cases where it runs on 2×4 of July and does not restart for more than 2 years. Hanging up either aircraft does not affect the other passenger aircraft or the host network. middle. The Feiniu OS itself is still iterating rapidly, and the underlying KVM functions are available but the verification time is short; Once the main system of Feiniu is restarted or down, it will fall together and the whole family will be disconnected.
performance loss very small. The N100 supports VT-d / SR-IOV, the network port can be directly connected or bridged, and the CPU iperf3 can run up to 2.5 G. The core display can also be assigned SR-IOV to Feiniu hard solution, and only 2 cores and 1 GB are enough for iKuai. slightly higher. After the Flying Bull host eats up 1~1.5 GB of memory + part of the CPU, and then allocates 2 cores and 1 GB to iKuai, the remaining resources are enough for lightweight NAS applications, but the CPU usage will reach 60-70% when using high concurrency transcoding + large bandwidth QoS.
Ease of use slightly more complicated. You have to install PVE first, connect to pass/bridge, and install two virtual machines, which has a learning cost for beginners. simple. In the graphical "application center", you can pull up the virtual machine with a few clicks; The Flying Bull comes with an OVS switch, which eliminates the need for command line bridging.
feature extension extremely strong. In addition to Flying Bull and Aikuai, you can also open OpenWrt, Windows, and Ubuntu on PVE; Snapshots, backups, clones, and clusters are fully functional. limited. The built-in KVM currently does not have advanced features such as cloning and scheduled backup.
the order of network startup dependent. PVE starts first, and then it doesn't matter who loves fast and flying bull first; PVE is still online when iAi crashes, and you can SSH to troubleshoot obstacles. dependent. You must wait for the flying bull host to start before you can pull up the love and fast; Therefore, during the first cold start, the downstream device will not be able to obtain DHCP for a short time, and it is necessary to set the iKuai to "automatic start" and add a delay of 30-60 seconds.
Note: The performance loss here refers to the performance loss of PVE as the bottom layer and Feiniu OS as the bottom layer, but the actual situation is the opposite. PVE + Feiniu OS + Love Kuai vs. Feiniu OS + Love Kuai, there is an additional system performance loss that is higher.
Quick Selection Suggestions:
  1. If you use the N100 as the "main entrance to the home network", the NAS is just a side hustle, or you need to be uninterrupted 24×7, please go directly to PVE. After PVE:
    • four network ports are made into a Linux Bridge (vmbr0-3), the first port is directly connected to iKuai as a WAN, and the remaining three ports are used as a LAN;
    • love fast gives 2 cores 1 GB hard drive 2 GB enough;
    • Feiniu gives 4 cores and 4 GB (depending on the transcoding requirements), and the disk uses all the left;
    • core display is open SR-IOV to 1 VF for Feiniu, which can be hardware transcoded to 4K H.265.
  2. if you want to use only one web interface to manage NAS and soft routing at the same time, it doesn't matter if the network is disconnected for 2-3 minutes, or if you just like to toss and turn the experience, then using Feiniu OS is no problem at all. Installation method: In order not to waste the 4-network port N100 small host Feiniu NAS, install Aikai to save a router
therefore: "stability, expansion, and long-term use" choose PVE virtual love fast and flying bull respectively; "Simple and acceptable disconnection" → Feiniudi virtual love fast. Choose one of the two according to your tolerance for network reliability.
Read More


Copyright Notice Scan to read on mobile
All Rights Reserved: 《SHUNOT》 => 《4. Is the N100 small host with the network port the underlying virtual Feiniu OS through PVE, or do you choose Feiniu OS as the underlying virtual Aikui?
Article URL: https://www.shunot.com/en/nas/683.html
Unless otherwise stated, all articles are original by 《Routing enthusiast》. Reposting is welcome! Please indicate the original URL when reposting, thank you.

Comment List

Cool summer breeze
Cool summer breezeReply
#44
It is simpler to choose Feiniu OS as the base, but the stability is slightly inferior; If you are looking for stability, PVE is a better choice. Both have their pros and cons, depending on whether you value ease of use or system reliability.
1 个月前
Autumn wind
Autumn windReply
#43
It is simpler to choose Feiniu OS, but the stability is poor, and the main system collapses and the whole network is paralyzed; Although PVE is complex, it is safer and more reliable, suitable for users who pursue stability. Just weigh it according to your needs.
2 个月前
Starry Sky Story
Starry Sky StoryReply
#42
It is simpler to choose Feiniu OS, but the stability is slightly worse; PVE is more stable and suitable for users who require high network reliability. Both have their own advantages and disadvantages, depending on personal needs.
2 个月前
The red dust is s...
The red dust is s...Reply
#41
It is safer to choose PVE, although it is slightly more complex but has high stability, and is suitable for users who value system security; Feiniu OS is simple and easy to use, but it is risky, suitable for players who are looking for convenience and can accept potential glitches.
2 个月前
Story Museum
Story MuseumReply
#40
It is simpler to choose Feiniu OS as the bottom, but the risk is high; PVE is stable and suitable for long-term operation. Depending on the trade-off of demand, PVE is a more reliable choice if stability is pursued.
2 个月前
Shimmer
ShimmerReply
#39
Choose PVE bottom is more stable and suitable for long-term operation; Feiniu OS is simple but high-risk, and once it crashes, you will lose everything. According to the demand trade-off, the PVE solution is recommended first.
2 个月前
Travelers have no...
Travelers have no...Reply
#38
It is simpler to choose Feiniu OS as the bottom, but the stability is weak, once the system crashes, the whole family will be disconnected; Using PVE is more stable, but the configuration is complicated. Depending on the trade-off of demand, PVE is a more reliable choice if stability is pursued.
2 个月前
Free flight
Free flightReply
#37
It is easier to choose Feiniu OS, but the stability is poor, and once there is a problem with the main system, Aikui will also be paralyzed, and the risk is higher. If you pursue stability, it is safer to use PVE as the bottom layer.
2 个月前
Under the moonlig...
Under the moonlig...Reply
#36
Choosing Feiniu OS is simpler, but the risk is high; PVE is more stable and suitable for users who value reliability. Depending on the demand, PVE is a better choice if stability is pursued.
2 个月前
Shimmer
ShimmerReply
#35
It is simpler to choose Feiniu OS, but the stability is slightly inferior; Using PVE is more stable, but the configuration is complicated. According to the trade-off of demand, if you are looking for stability, PVE is a better choice.
2 个月前
Fireworks are eas...
Fireworks are eas...Reply
#34
It is simpler to choose Feiniu OS as the bottom, but the stability is poor, and once there is a problem with the main system, iKuai will also disconnect the network. PVE virtualization is more reliable but more complex if you want stability. Weigh it clearly before deciding.
2 个月前
The sword points ...
The sword points ...Reply
#33
It is easier to choose Feiniu OS as the bottom, but the stability is slightly poor, once there is a problem with the main system, Aikai will also be paralyzed, suitable for users who do not have high requirements for stability.
3 个月前
Wandering the world
Wandering the worldReply
#32
It is easier to choose Feiniu OS as the bottom, but the stability is slightly weaker, and once there is a problem with the main system, Aikai will also be disconnected, and the risk is higher. If stability is pursued, PVE virtualization is more reliable and suitable for long-term operation.
3 个月前
The stars and moo...
The stars and moo...Reply
#31
It is simpler to choose Feiniu OS as the bottom, but the risk is high; Using PVE to divide the virtual machine is more stable, but it is a bit cumbersome. According to the trade-off of demand, PVE is a safer choice if stability is pursued.
3 个月前
In a single thought
In a single thoughtReply
#30
It is simpler to choose Feiniu OS as the base, but the stability is slightly worse; Using PVE to divide virtual machines is a bit more complicated, but it is more reliable. According to the trade-off of demand, PVE is a better choice if stability is valued.
3 个月前

Contact Us

Online Consultation: Click here to send me a message

WeChat ID: master_135

Scan to follow